AgResearch
Browse

File(s) not publicly available

Synergy between two invasive species, redback spiders and rabbits, threaten the endangered Cromwell chafer beetle

journal contribution
posted on 2023-05-03, 22:12 authored by Jackie Spencer, Yolanda van Heezik, Philip Seddon, Barbara BarrattBarbara Barratt
Abstract Interactions between invasive species can be difficult to predict and can result in unanticipated impacts of significance for native fauna. Here we show that introduced European rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) create habitat that enables invasive redback spiders (Latrodectus hasselti Thorell, 1870) to establish and prey upon the nationally endangered, endemic Cromwell chafer beetle (Prodontria lewisii Broun, 1904). We examined the spatial relationship between rabbit holes and redback spider occurrence, recorded all prey caught in redback spider webs over a 4-month period, and tested the role rabbit holes play in providing habitat for redback spiders experimentally, by filling in rabbit holes in areas used by spiders and monitoring subsequent occupation of the areas over four months. Redback spiders predominately resided in old rabbit holes, with the highest densities of spiders coinciding with high densities of rabbit holes. Cromwell chafer beetles were commonly caught in webs. Filling in rabbit holes eliminated the presence of redback spiders at all treated sites and reduced prey capture in those areas. Conservation management to protect Cromwell chafer beetles should focus on eliminating rabbits and their holes from beetle habitat.

History

Rights statement

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG. Part of Springer Nature.

Language

  • English

Does this contain Māori information or data?

  • No

Publisher

Springer Nature

Journal title

Biological Invasions

ISSN

1387-3547

Citation

Spencer, J., van Heezik, Y., Seddon, P. J., & Barratt, B. I. P. (2017). Synergy between two invasive species, redback spiders and rabbits, threaten the endangered Cromwell chafer beetle. Biological Invasions, 19(5), 1379–1387. doi:10.1007/s10530-016-1352-6

Usage metrics

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC