AgResearch
Browse
- No file added yet -

Horse Sector Participants’ Attitudes towards Anthropomorphism and Animal Welfare and Wellbeing

Download (1.45 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2024-08-28, 23:20 authored by Julie Fiedler, Margaret Ayre, Sarah RosanowskiSarah Rosanowski, Josh Slater

Adopting contemporary animal welfare and wellbeing assessment methods requires making inferences about psychological experiences, a process at risk of anthropomorphic bias. Respondents to an online survey were asked for their opinions on how anthropomorphism could relate to horse wellbeing. The results suggest that experienced horse sector participants were aware of the effects of anthropomorphism, including its potential beneficial and detrimental impacts on horse welfare and wellbeing. This included the beneficial effect of motivating individuals to care for horses and the detrimental effect of misinterpreting horse behaviors. The authors propose that anthropomorphism has a place in horse wellbeing when used critically and with caution. Horse-related organizations should actively manage anthropomorphism in policies and practices to avoid compromising animal welfare and wellbeing practices.

History

Rights statement

© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Publication date

2024-08-26

Project number

  • Non revenue

Language

  • English

Does this contain Māori information or data?

  • No

Publisher

MDPI

Journal title

Animals

ISSN

2076-2615

Volume/issue number

14 (7)

Page numbers

2482

Usage metrics

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC