AgResearch
Browse
Tresoldi et al. 2017 Cal Agr.pdf (1.06 MB)

Cow cooling on commercial drylot dairies: a description of 10 farms in California.

Download (1.06 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2023-05-03, 13:57 authored by Grazyne Tresoldi, Karin SchutzKarin Schutz, Cassandra Tucker
California summers are hot, compromising the welfare and productivity of dairy cows. To minimize negative effects, producers use shade, fans and sprayed water. However, little is known about how those heat abatement strategies are provided in commercial conditions, nor their effectiveness. Ten dairies with drylots, a common housing system in California, were assessed for strategies provided, and the cows' responses to heat load were observed for 3 days in the afternoon. Dairies were diverse in all aspects. Shade varied in terms of placement (at corral and feed bunk or at corral only) and amount (28 to 74 square feet, or 2.6 to 6.9 square meters, per cow). The quantity of water used to spray cows ranged from 0 to 6.8 gallons (0 to 25.6 liters) per hour per cow. Across dairies, there was a range in the cows' shade use (47% to 98% of herd) and feeding activity (7% to 33% of herd). Respiration rates ranged from 65 (normal) to 95 breaths per minute (very hot) and were positively related to inactivity. Our results indicate that there are opportunities to improve cooling, and consequently dairy cattle welfare, in drylots.

History

Rights statement

Material published in California Agriculture, excluding photographs, is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/#).

Language

  • English

Does this contain Māori information or data?

  • No

Publisher

University of California

Journal title

California Agriculture

ISSN

0008-0845

Citation

Tresoldi, G., Schutz, K. E., & Tucker, C. (2017). Cow cooling on commercial drylot dairies: a description of 10 farms in California. California Agriculture, 71(4), 249–255. doi:10.3733/ca.2017a0042

Usage metrics

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC