AgResearch
Browse

File(s) not publicly available

Comparison of four learning-based methods for predicting groundwater redox status

journal contribution
posted on 2024-06-21, 03:50 authored by Michael Friedel, Scott Wilson, Murray Close, Paolo Buscema, Phillip Abraham, Laura Banasiak
Knowing the location where groundwater denitrification occurs, or by proxy the groundwater redox status (oxic, mixed, and anoxic), is valuable information for assessing and managing potential agricultural land-use impacts on freshwater quality. We compare the efficacy of supervised and unsupervised learning-based methods to predict groundwater redox status in the agriculturally dominated Tasman, Waikato, and Wellington regions of New Zealand. Overall, the supervised methods demonstrate a prediction bias toward oxic conditions and inability to perform statistically well when using independent regional data. By contrast, the unsupervised method performs statistically well when predicting oxic, mixed, and anoxic conditions and corresponding depths when using independent regional data. The unsupervised learning method provides added benefits.

Funding

Funded by the New Zealand Ministry for Business, Innovation and Employment's Our Land and Water National Science Challenge (Toitū te Whenua, Toiora te Wai) as part of project Sources and Flows

History

Publication date

2019-09-07

Language

  • English

Does this contain Māori information or data?

  • No

Journal title

Journal of Hydrology (New Zealand)

Usage metrics

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC