AgResearch
Browse

File(s) not publicly available

Assessing heat load in drylot cattle: Refining on-farm sampling methodology

journal contribution
posted on 2023-05-03, 15:56 authored by G Tresoldi, Karin SchutzKarin Schutz, C Tucker
Identifying dairy cattle experiencing heat stress and adopting appropriate mitigation strategies can improve welfare and profitability. However, little is known about how cattle use heat abatement resources (shade, sprayed water) on drylot dairies. It is also unclear how often we need to observe animals to measure high heat load, or the relevance of specific aspects of this response, particularly in terms of panting. Our objectives were to describe and determine sampling intervals to measure cattle use of heat abatement resources, respiration rate (RR) and panting characteristics (drooling, open mouth, protruding tongue), and to evaluate the relationship between the latter 2. High-producing cows were chosen from 4 drylots (8 cows/dairy, n = 32) and observed for at least 5.9 h (1000 to 1800 h, excluding milking) when air temperature, humidity, and the combined index averaged 33°C, 30%, and 79, respectively. Use of heat abatement resources was recorded continuously; RR and the presence and absence of each panting characteristic were recorded every 5 min. From the observed values, estimates using the specified sub-sampling intervals were calculated for heat abatement resource use (1, 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 60, 90, and 120 min), and for RR and panting (10, 15, 20, 30, 60, 90, and 120 min). Estimates and observed values were compared using linear regression. Sampling intervals were considered accurate if they met 3 criteria: R2 ≥ 0.9, intercept = 0, and slope = 1. The relationship between RR and each panting characteristic was analyzed using mixed models. Cows used shade (at corral or over feed bunk) and feed bunk area (where water was sprayed) for about 90 and 50% of the observed time, respectively, and used areas with no cooling for 2 min at a time, on average. Cows exhibited drooling (34 ± 4% of observations) more often than open mouth and protruding tongue (11 ± 3 and 8 ± 3% of observations, respectively). Respiration rate varied depending on the presence of panting (with vs. without drool present: 97 ± 3 vs. 74 ± 3 breaths/min; open vs. closed mouth: 104 ± 4 vs. 85 ± 4 breaths/min; protruding vs. non-protruding tongue: 105 ± 5 vs. 91 ± 5 breaths/min). Accurate estimates were obtained when using sampling intervals ≤90 min for RR, ≤60 min for corral shade and sprayed water use, and ≤30 min for drooling. In a hot and dry climate, cows kept in drylots had higher RR when showing panting characteristics than when these were absent, and used shade extensively, avoiding areas with no cooling. In general, 30 min intervals were most efficient for measuring heat load responses.

History

Rights statement

© 2016 American Dairy Science Association®.

Language

  • English

Does this contain Māori information or data?

  • No

Publisher

Elsevier

Journal title

Journal of Dairy Science

ISSN

0022-0302

Citation

Tresoldi, G., Schutz, K. E., & Tucker, C. B. (2016). Assessing heat load in drylot cattle: Refining on-farm sampling methodology. Journal of Dairy Science, 99(11), 8970–8980. doi:10.3168/jds.2016-11353

Usage metrics

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC