AgResearch
Browse

File(s) not publicly available

A modified enzymatic method for measuring insect sugars and the effect of storing samples in ethanol on subsequent trehalose measurements

journal contribution
posted on 2023-05-03, 19:46 authored by Craig PhillipsCraig Phillips, Ela Sawicka, Ilia Iline, Maksim Novoselov, J. Jiao, Nicky RichardsNicky Richards, Scott HardwickScott Hardwick
A modified method for enzymatically measuring concentrations of glucose, fructose and trehalose in parasitoid wasps is described and evaluated. The method has high specificity, gives results comparable to high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), and its sensitivity is similar to HPLC. The enzymatic method is quicker and less expensive than HPLC, and is safer, faster and more sensitive than another commonly used insect sugar determination method, the anthrone test. The method has potential to measure additional sugars, and details for measuring sucrose are provided as supplementary material. We also investigate if endogenous enzymes can retain activity in insects preserved in ethanol, thus potentially skewing insect sugar measurements. The results show that the enzyme trehalase, which converts the insect haemolymph sugar trehalose to glucose, can remain active in insect specimens that are stored whole in ethanol. Thus, sugar measurements from insects preserved in this way have potential for bias towards low trehalose and high glucose. In contrast, the activity of endogenous trehalase in insects that are crushed in ethanol is either much reduced or eliminated.

History

Rights statement

© 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Language

  • English

Does this contain Māori information or data?

  • No

Publisher

Elsevier

Journal title

Biological Control

ISSN

1049-9644

Citation

Phillips, C. B., Hiszczynska-Sawicka, E., Iline, I. I., Novoselov, M., Jiao, J., Richards, N. K., & Hardwick, S. (2018). A modified enzymatic method for measuring insect sugars and the effect of storing samples in ethanol on subsequent trehalose measurements. Biological Control, 126, 127–135. doi:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2018.08.008